Maternity Care Options

Should You Write A Birth Plan?

Posted on Jan 29, 2009 in Childbirth Options, Featured, Maternity Care Options | 0 comments

Should You Write A Birth Plan?

I was doing some research for a page on Birth Plans (for the business which I founded and have now sold: www.sweethomebirth.com) and was surprised this past week when I went to get a haircut (gasp!) and read Modern times: Don’t be so pushy – Making a “birth plan” is about more than being prepared. It’s about being in control. Here’s why letting go of all that is way harder – and that much better by Katrina Onstad in Chatelaine at the salon. I couldn’t decide how I felt about the piece. On the one hand, here was a mainstream national magazine that was talking about midwifery in a very off-hand way, as if it is becoming the norm and I do agree with the main message which is that “sometimes the best plan is no plan at all.” It’s important to not get too caught up in the whole plan part of the birth plan because, well, we really can’t plan our births. She is right to say that when it comes to birth we have to expect the unexpected and not get overly attached to our vision of the ideal birth. But then again, something rubbed me the wrong way. I mean, it was easy for her to say that the best plan is no plan at all when she had lucked out with an unmedicated natural birth which left her feeling like she “had birthed the universe”. A beautiful way to put it, but not necessarily how other mothers feel when they end up with a horrifying intervention-filled birth. The author suggests that the reason these mothers feel disappointed is because they have too many expectations going into it. Plan or no plan, aren’t these mothers entitled to mourn unnecessary medical interventions? Perhaps Ms. Onstad would be writing a completely different article had she endured a 36 hour labour that ended in a cesarean birth while under general anesthetic. You can bet she’d be researching and making birth plans for her second birth. There is something hypocritical about this romanticization of her own birth when the article’s theme clearly seems to be that “the romanticization of the birth moment is not good for women” (as quoted by cesarean mom Judith). This statement erroneously puts the blame for all these disappointed women on the women themselves, for having plans and expectations. Despite mentioning the rising rates and risks of cesarean birth, Onstad neglects to suppose that labor mis-managment and the cascade of interventions could be the culprits for all the disappointment. Finally, Onstad makes a huge mistake by thinking that creating a birth plan to speak for you regarding your consent to medical procedures equates to an inability to submit to the forces of labour. She says: I was completely and totally out of control, but that moment of submission – totally without any expectation of anything – held the greatest power I’ve ever experienced. Is it not possible to still have that moment of submission while ensuring that your medical rights aren’t violated? What if Onstad’s birth had left her feeling that all her power had been stripped from her, that her body had been violated, or that she couldn’t protect her baby from painful or scary procedures? The difference in these two situations is that in one case the mother submits to the forces of labour, her birth and nature and in the other the mother must submit to the power of the medical system, which unfortunately isn’t omniscient. Having a birth plan is a way of exercising your right to informed consent in your most vulnerable moments, not a way to avoid submitting to the unknowable. I was divided over whether or not to post the article but I couldn’t stop thinking about it, particularly because I loved the dialogue between the article and a blog post I found from one of the commenters. Phd in Parenting wrote a lovely thoughtful (and a little irate) piece in response to the Chatelaine article. She makes an extremely valid point that when you trust your care...

Read More